View on the web: 141209

As 2009 concludes, let's get ready for an even more active 2010

Hello from Right Principles Our November "Meet the Candidates" dinner in Bridgeport, CT was a rousing success. The candidates joined us and shared their views with us and over a hundred of their closest friends. We hope you can join us at our next event in the first quarter of 2010 when we'll put a few more logs on the fire to keep the heat up. 2010 will be a crucial year leading into the midterm elections. We'll continue to stay active in sharing our views and ideas. We hope you'll join us... We are proud to have been publicized by the American Thinker with our explanation of the Sandpile.

Barack "The Builder" Obama by Tom Blom (12/7/09)  - 4/15/10: Tea Parties are already being scheduled. Participation is crucial! I have been wrecking my brain for well over a year now because Barack Obama’s “Yes We Can” campaign slogan did not seem very new from the first time I heard it. The dots finally connected a few weeks ago when I sat on the couch at home watching the movie “Marley & Me.” At some point during the movie the leading characters played by Owen Wilson and Jennifer Aniston move their family to a new home in Pennsylvania and during a scene in the new house Ms. Anniston starts a VHS tape. An episode of “Bob the Builder” appeared on TV [1]. I have known Bob for several years since he is my nephew’s favorite animated character. The height of Bob-gear strewn all over the place was probably three years ago when the kid was four years old. Bob is a contractor with a bunch of machinery in his yard. The punch lines in the series are Bob asking the machinery “Can we fix it?” and the response “Yes we can!” You see, President Obama was elected on a slogan that appeals to four-year-olds… Keeping that in mind, it is not all that difficult to understand why he is proceeding to fundamentally change America [2] at breakneck speed. The changes necessary for Obama to build his perfect America have to be put in place before America grows up and out of “Bob the Builder” mode. One significant problem in that strategy has appeared since the election of our 44th President. America has grown up; much quicker than anyone in the Democrat Party could have imagined. Only eight months passed between inauguration and 9/12/2009. In those eight months a lot of people from around the nation realized that something was going wrong. They made the trip to Washington D.C. and a crowd roughly matching the size of the one on inauguration day assembled. On 9/12 we told Congress that enough is enough. We’re not a country of four-year-olds! Read the rest here:  Builder

Freedom Fugitive by Mike Suslov "Give me control over a nation's credit, and I care not who makes her laws." Even if no Rothschild ever really said that, it’s the policy which that illustrious family and their fellow mega-bankers have followed successfully for over 200 years. Thus the international Plutocrats and their political allies in this country never really lose control of the Situation, in the most fundamental sense, because their power fundamentally amounts to control over the supply of money and credit. Jackson in the 1830s, Reagan in the early 1980s, and the Gingrich Republicans in 1994 fought against this Money Racket, but let’s look at what happens when the anti-plutocrats temporarily gain an upper hand. Jackson did not renew the Second US Bank Charter, a bank whose principal investor was the Rothschild Bank of Paris, in 1836, and a year later the Rothschild Bank of London, through its state organ the Bank of England, withdrew its securities offerings from the American market and caused the Panic of '37, ditching the prosperity of Jackson's anti-Bank policy and causing a depression that lasted 7 years. In later years, in a similar way, the Rothschild-Morgan alliance "facilitated" panics and depressions in 1873, 1893, and 1907. In the latter year the Morgan bank came to the rescue of failing banks, and bought up many of them, in the same way that they gobbled up Bear Stearns and WAMU last year. The financial "crisis" of 1907 directly led to the creation in 1913 of the Federal Reserve System which was a "creature" of the Rothschild Morgan Warburg syndicate and their allies. That legacy remains with us. Last year Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley were "allowed" to transform themselves from failing investment banks to bank holding companies protected by the regulations of the Federal Reserve. That made them eligible for Federal Reserve loans at nearly 0% interest, and that liquidity fostered their Wall Street resurgence which continues to date. Now they are making billions. Bush Treasury Secretary Paulson, a former Goldman executive officer, approved the change-over after consulting with "market participants" and the Federal Reserve Bank of NY chairman Tim Geithner who now happens to be the new Treasury Secretary! This is by Paulson’s own admission. It is I believe a violation of the Treasury secretary’s public trust to consult with ANY Wall Street bankers, let alone his former (??) employers!!! This is the kind of thing we are up against. This is why any successful real-conservative revolts tend to be short-lived. What makes this Situation work is a money racket which is really quite fascinating. It’s all based on the Federal Reserve System, the biggest open conspiracy of the past 100 years. The Fed is a central bank which does not use its own money, not even “our” money: it plays with borrowed money. The Fed is funded by a group of the largest commercial and investment banks -- both of foreign and domestic venue - and is there primarily to lend money to the U.S. Government. It also lends money to the 12 regional member banks which in turn lend money to commercial banks in the Federal Reserve System. Those banks then lend their borrowed money to businesses and individuals. All of this insures that everyone is perpetually in debt, including the Federal Government. That debt becomes our debt, since the interest on the debt is paid with the taxes levied by the Federal Government on the people. Read the rest here: Freedom Fugitive

Third Party Right and Wrong Executive Summary by Tim D. Enchanter For those who may not know, an Executive Summary is the condensed version of a report given to an Executive to read. Most corporate executives are busy, busy, busy, busy and make Alice’s White Rabbit looks lethargic in comparison. Rather than ask the executive to spend an hour reading a report written by an underling who makes less in a year than the executive makes in an hour, the underling writes a second report that gives the executive the proverbial “bottom line”. What started out as an article has evolved into a dissertation because of all the information which has become necessary. The resulting report is intended for average Americans who want to take the government back from the politicians we can no longer trust. It is designed to arm said Patriots with the understanding needed to effectively wage this political battle. Most people may know some of the things I write about but only a few know all of them. If you are one of the few, the proud, the over-educated, or want to save valuable time then you can just read this Executive Summary and “Move On”. If you want to enjoy the amusing anecdotes which weave together the informational tapestry, read both and enjoy. Here is my report in a nutshell. There are two major political parties: the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. Originally, they were founded by Thomas Jefferson as the Democratic Republican Party but eventually split into two opposing sides. Having no creative imagination whatsoever, they just split the name in half and spent the last couple centuries arguing over custody of the government. Disenchanted voters believe those two parties eventually agreed to joint custody and started fighting over the voters. Really disenchanted voters believe the custody fight involves tax revenue. The truly infuriated voters believe the fight has been settled, We The People are the ones paying for it, and the lawyers are the ones getting paid. Like the children in the divorce analogy, the voters have gone back and forth from one party to the other, each time being promised everything they want but instead getting everything they hate, all the time being caught in the middle. So, like those poor kids, some voters eventually decided to go off and form their own party. Each “Third Party” ends up being used as a weapon by one of the original two parties while trying to learn the lessons of the previous Third Parties. Sooner or later, enough Third Parties would learn enough lessons that the shared knowledge would allow them to band together and effectively hold the original two Major Parties accountable. This report attempts to provide that knowledge. This is all necessary because too many Legislators read only the Executive Summary and do not read the rest of the Bill before they sign it. As is usually the case, “the devil is in the details”, and the pretty lies are in the Executive Summary. The best example of the result was Senator Claire McCaskill from Missouri, in front of a Town Hall Meeting filled with her constituents in the “Show-Me State”, wearing the expression of a confused little waif asking, “Don’t you trust me?”, to which the entire auditorium bellowed out, “NO!” (YouTube video moment of the year, IMHO). Keeping with the lessons of this analogy, I am pleased to tell you that I lied about the purpose of this Executive Summary. Instead of a summary, I wrote a teaser piece designed to make you want to read the full report or risk not knowing what the voters are about to do. Remember this lesson for there will be a test on Election Day. If you're not an executive, read the entire "Third Party Right and Wrong" article here.